Extra Judicial Killing by State Apparatus (Extra Judicial Kiling) Case Study Kilometre 50 Cikampek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37010/hmr.v3i1.68Keywords:
state apparatus, murder, human rights violationsAbstract
Shootings by state apparatus should be the last resort in accordance with Perkapolri Number 1 of 2009 concerning the Use of Force in Police Actions, taking into account the principles of nesesitas, legality, and proportionality. However, in practice, procedural irregularities often occur that lead to extra-judicial killings. Perkapolri Number 8 of 2009 emphasises that members of the National Police must not commit human rights violations in carrying out their duties. Every individual has the right to legal protection, freedom from torture, punishment and inhumane treatment. Law No. 2 of 2002 authorises state apparatus to act in the public interest, but still within the corridors of the law. The case of the shooting of six members of the FPI Laskar at KM 50 Cikampek Toll Road on 7 December 2020 sparked controversy. The police claimed that this action was an effort to disable threats, but the families of the victims and human rights organisations considered that the action was a form of extrajudicial killing. This case raises questions about the accountability of state apparatus in enforcing the law without committing human rights violations.
References
Nasution, B. J. (2011). Negara hukum dan hak asasi manusia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Arifin, F. (2019). Hak asasi manusia: Teori perkembangan dan pengaturan. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.
Pardede, H. (2015). Warta hak asasi manusia humanis. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Aprita, S., et al. (2020). Hukum dan hak asasi manusia. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.
Komnas HAM. (n.d.). Buku putih pelanggaran HAM berat pembunuhan enam pengawal HRS.
Dwi Putranto, R., & Harvelian, A. (2023). Group counseling as an effort to improve effectiveness implementation of correction client personality guidance (case study at West Jakarta Class 1 Penitentiary). Postulat, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.37010/postulat.v1i1.1137
Tempo.co. (2020, Desember 7). Penembakan pengawal Rizieq Shihab saksi enam korban masih hidup saat di KM 50. Tempo.co. Retrieved from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1412888/penembakan-pengawal-rizieq-shihab-saksi-enam-korban-masih-hidup-saat-di-km-50
Shrawat, A. (n.d.). Extra-judicial killing and the role of international. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2938358
Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. (2022). Putusan Nomor 868/Pid.B/2021/PN.Jkt.Sel tanggal 18 Maret 2022.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2022). Putusan Nomor 938K/Pid/2022.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Apriyadi, Wiend Sakty Myharto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.